MGMT 321 Aviation System Analysis. Create your ISD utilizing Microsoft Visio®

I need help with a Management question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Hi!

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

Group Project Design Phase: Part 1

Create your ISD utilizing Microsoft Visio®. Create a new ISD from scratch for this activity.

Ensure that you select the Categories (not Featured) menu selection from above the templates that are presented and select General/Basic Diagram. Once you open a basic diagram, select More Shapes/Software & Database/Software/UML Class in the Shapes menu. You will drag/drop/modify the Class shape to represent your interface elements.

The name data must be presented in text boxes that are reflective of the interface elements (screens, forms, and reports) that will be presented to the users of the information system. A tree-type numbering system for the interface elements must be utilized.

When evaluating the menus, be sure to consider those that might be associated with the aviation-related business.

Your ISD data must address the following requirements:

  • Submit your ISD in a Portrait orientation.
  • Submit the following data in your ISD:
    • Do not follow the data presented in Figure 9-10 in the textbook
    • ONE main menu interface element.
    • Title the main menu interface element “Main Menu.”
    • Number the main menu interface element ‘0’ (zero) in the top section and “1.1” in the bottom section.
    • TWO submenu interface elements under the main menu.
    • Title the two submenu interface elements with the same noun-related titles of the two Data Stores in the DFD fragments submitted in Module 6.
    • Number the two submenu interface elements as follows:
      • “1” and “2” in the top sections.
      • “1.1.1” and “1.1.2” in the bottom sections.
    • Number the submenu interface elements in the top and bottom sections relative to the main menu numbers.
    • THREE interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) per submenu interface element.
    • Title the interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) with the same verb-related data of the two processes in the DFD fragments in Module 6. Note: You will have to create a new type of IMS process data for each submenu interface element to fulfill the requirement for THREE interface elements.
    • Number the interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) in the top and bottom sections relative to the submenu interface element numbers.
      • “1.1,” “1.2,” “1.3” in the top sections for the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “1.”
      • “2.1,” “2.2,” And “2.3” in the top sections for the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “2.”
      • “1.1.1” in each of the bottom sections of the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “1.”
      • “1.1.2” in each of the bottom sections of the three interface elements (screens, forms, or reports) of submenu “2.”
  • Submit your ISD in VSDX file format.

Here is the grading rubic:

MGMT 321 8.3 Group Project Design Phase: Part 1 Rubric

MGMT 321 8.3 Group Project Design Phase: Part 1 Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Deliverable Requirements The percentage of the deliverable(s) that meet the assignment’s requirements.

40.0 pts Excellent

The deliverable(s) met ALL of the assignment’s requirements.

35.0 pts Very Good

The deliverable(s) met MOST of the assignment’s requirements.

30.0 pts Satisfactory

The deliverable(s) met MANY of the assignment’s requirements.

25.0 pts Near Failing

The deliverable(s) met SOME of the assignment’s requirements.

0.0 pts Failing

The deliverable(s) did NOT meet ANY of the assignment’s requirements.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Team Deliverable(s) The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) that were submitted for evaluation.

20.0 pts Excellent

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a VERY HIGH level.

18.0 pts Very Good

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a HIGH level.

16.0 pts Satisfactory

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a MODERATE level.

14.0 pts Near Failing

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at a LOW level.

0.0 pts Failing

The composition and details of the team deliverable(s) were presented at an UNSATISFACTORY level.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Accuracy of the Team Deliverable(s) The accuracy of the values in the team deliverable(s) that were submitted for evaluation .

20.0 pts Excellent

ALL of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

18.0 pts Very Good

MOST of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

16.0 pts Satisfactory

MUCH of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

14.0 pts Near Failing

SOME of the data in the team deliverable(s) were accurate.

0.0 pts Failing

NONE of the data in the deliverable(s) were accurate.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Individual Team Member Data The quality of the data that the team member uploaded into the Canvas Files directory.

10.0 pts Excellent

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a VERY HIGH level.

8.0 pts Very Good

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a HIGH level.

6.0 pts Satisfactory

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a MODERATE level.

4.0 pts Near Failing

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at a LOW level.

0.0 pts Failing

The composition and details of the individual deliverable(s) were presented at an UNSATISFACTORY level.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Team Member Communications & Participation The team member’s responsiveness to communications and timeliness in meeting the assignment deadlines.

10.0 pts Excellent

The team member’s communications and participation were at a VERY HIGH level.

8.0 pts Very Good

The team member’s communications and participation were at a HIGH level.

6.0 pts Satisfactory

The team member’s communications and participation were at a MODERATE level.

4.0 pts Near Failing

The team member’s communications and participation were at a LOW level.

0.0 pts Failing

The team member’s communications and participation were at an UNSATISFACTORY level.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0


Order the answer to view it

Assignment Solutions


Assignment Solutions

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER AND GET 20% DICOUNT. USE CODE: GET2O