Harvard University Tuskegee E

write a reply to my classmate. I will give you my discussion and the lecture and my classmates post, and you have to write a reply for him about one strong peregarph that has a topic sentence and intro body and conclusion paragraph about 8-9 sentences. identify two ethical issues from the text and discuss how they connect to the Tuskegee Experiment.  How was it possible so many participants were deceived for so long?  How might the researchers have justified the experiment and continuing the deception?  Is there any way this could have been done differently, more ethically?  Do you think the results of this study outweighed the obvious risks to participants? * The question of the discussion: watch the short film below (and do your own research if you’d like!)”Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment * My answer for the discussion: The two ethical issues identified are respect for persons and beneficence. Beneficence is where researchers are expected to minimize possible harms and maximize the benefits to the subjects. Respect for persons is where researchers are expected to treat persons as autonomous agents and to respect those with diminished autonomy. The two ethical issues connected with the Tuskegee experiment were that the researchers involved did not observe the ethics of research. It was possible to deceive the many participants for so long because they were guided by the need to get medical assistance after the experiment. In addition, the researchers had lied about the harmful effects of the dose; therefore, the people could participate in the experiment with false information. The researcher continued the deception by providing false information to the participants and promising to assist them with free medical camps. The experiment could be done differently by informing the participants to obtain their consent to participate in the research, and also, it could be possible to utilize non-human subjects to determine the same experiment (Barash, 2020). The results of the experiments did not outweigh the risks to participants since they did not adhere to the ethical guidelines of conducting research and did not obtain the informed consent of the participants. My classmate post: Jessica:The two ethical issues from the text I discovered were 1) Unjust: unethical research was conducted, and the Tuskegee people were not provided with information so that they could have read the option to decide for themselves whether they wanted to go through with the experiment or not and they were promised medical care and treatments were never proven effective. I would consider this to be more cruel/inhumane and as them being African American they weren’t given opportunity/ proper behavior and or treatment. No genuine respect was given. They were considered to be poor, illiterate sharecroppers. The second ethical issue is 2) Basic Bioethical Principle: this consists of Autonomy, Justice, Beneficence, & Maleficence, and these principles were all violated. Their health care ethics were violated and was unethical because many of the participants were harmed. They were not fully informed in order to make an autonomous decision (perspective decision making). They never informed them of their syphilis diagnosis and how they could infect others. Side effects include: blindness, deafness, bone deterioration, heart disease, and mental illness.  Many of these sharecroppers were illiterate and uneducated so they didn’t know their rights or that they were being violated. I believe if they were informed of their diagnosis, of the side effects of such illness, and that the medical treatment was not proven affective, then it would have been more ethical. To top it off only the African American’s were being treated and not the whites so that made is more racist. Yes it outweighed the obvious risks but they weren’t told that they could continue to spread the disease if they weren’t properly treated and how bad their infection was.

Order the answer to view it

Assignment Solutions

Assignment Solutions


Posted in Uncategorized